Movies: Braveheart and Outlaw King

I should really cover more history here.  The history of the Scots-English border region is the history of hillbillies.

Netflix’s recently released Outlaw/King starring Chris Pine spurred me to finally pick up my old review copy of Michael Penman’s Robert the Bruce: King of the Scots.  I haven’t gotten very far, but Penman’s book is focused on the Bruce’s reign after Bannockburn, so William Wallace appears relatively early.  And I can’t read about William Wallace without pulling out Braveheart.  I took advantage of needing to grade a giant stack of essays to watch Outlaw/King and rewatch Braveheart.



Braveheart starts off right, with an R-rating for “brutal medieval violence.”  It has two themes: stabbing people and liberty, which puts it squarely in my wheelhouse.  It also holds a special place it my heart because it was maybe the last movie I saw in the theater with my dad.  The initial theater run was limited and traveling 30 minutes and getting into an R-rated movie was still a bit of a tall order.

Braveheart is a great movie—well-acted, paced, told, everything—even if it does make only the vaguest nods toward the actual history and even if it does suffer from a bit of this-time-its-personal-itis (more on that in a bit).

The complex character of Robert the Bruce, and his portrayal by Angus MacFayden, is an underappreciated highlight of Braveheart, which is fitting given today’s theme.  (MacFayden, by the way, is reprising his most famous role in another Robert the Bruce movie, with this one more directly positioned as a Braveheart sequel.)

5 of 5 Stars.



The parental guidelines promise “brutal war violence”—that’s a good start.  Outlaw/King winds up being a bit of a sequel to Braveheart as well.  (How could a movie about Robert the Bruce not be given Braveheart’s cultural resonance?)

Outlaw/King opens with Bruce bending the knee to Edward I.  Wallace’s execution is a catalyst, if only because the reaction to it shows Bruce that the Scots are not as comfortable bending the knee as his fellow nobles.  The real focus, though, is on the period between Bruce’s disastrous defeat in his first battle as king and his first victory in a pitched battle at Loudoun Hill.  During that period he was truly an outlaw king.  He also proved himself one of the great guerilla fighters of history.

I’m not expert on Scottish history, but you can tell Netflix took more care with the history.  It takes care in particular with medieval mores and custom.  (They’re still not smart enough to use night arrows though.)  They weren’t kidding about the brutal war violence.

Outlaw/King is really damn good.  I hate to say it, but it could have benefited from a longer runtime.  The romance with Bruce’s second, arranged wife and the post-Methven misery porn Bruce endures are well developed.  Bruce’s decision to turn on the English and his guerilla war are not.

4.5 of 5 Stars.


The most interesting contrast between the two movies is in how they handle romance.  In Braveheart, Wallace initially refuses to fight and only changes his mind after his wife is killed.  (Which undercuts him as a patriot hero, even if it may have basis in fact.)  That romance is what wins him the help of Isabella of France and then allows Wallace to literally cuck Edward II.  In Outlaw/King, Bruce initially sends his new wife away so he can deliberate with his brothers over how to respond to Wallace’s execution.  But Elizabeth de Burgh, daughter of an important ally of Edward I, chooses him.  And she pays for it.  When she is taken, Bruce doesn’t run off.  He wants to, but his duty (and, frankly, his ambition) won’t allow it.

24 thoughts on “Movies: Braveheart and Outlaw King

  1. I enjoyed The Outlaw King and thought it a good movie and like you, I thought a longer runtime would have been in the movie’s best interest. In fact, I wonder whether breaking up into a miniseries would not have served it better.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. It’s getting to be where too many stories that would make a good movie are being turned into overlong miniseries or TV shows too. Three hours could have been about perfect, at least for the story they were trying to tell.

      Apparently the original cut was longer, but they whittled it down after poor initial critical reception.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Hail The Black Douglas! - Frontier Partisans

    1. The “night arrows” reference and video clip are from the movie Timeline (based on a Michael Crichton book). The “night arrows” gag only makes what very little sense it does because fire arrows are so egregiously overused by Hollywood.

      Did Mel Brooks mock flaming arrows in Men in Tights? OF COURSE he did.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Yeah, I think I arrived at my brother’s house as he was watching a movie set during the crusades, and a sentry yelled out a warning about night arrows, which made us both burst out laughing.

        I’ll have to watch that clip when I can turn on the sound. In fact, I probably need to watch that whole movie.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. I just watched Outlaw King, and man…poor Robert the Bruce. If I hadn’t seen this and looked up the historical accuracy of this and Braveheart, I would have gone on thinking Robert was a craven traitor.

    Enjoyed Outlaw King, but the ending was kind of dumb.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. He DID switch sides several times. He wasn’t the wimp he was portrayed as in Braveheart, but he was considerably more Machiavellian than he was portrayed as in either movie.

      I agree about the ending. I was ready to shout from the rooftops about how Outlaw/King is better than Braveheart…but then they cut the guerilla war short, the last battle dragged on too long, and, oof, that duel. Worst of all was when [SPOILERS] Bruce just lets the king walk away. While his wife and children are in English hands. When he could easily trade the king for their freedom and more security for his own throne. So the ending marred an otherwise great movie. Still a very, very good one in my estimation.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. J. D. Brink

    I saw the ad for Outlaw King and wondered, “Where does Braveheart ft in here?” It looked so similar that I thought maybe Braveheart was kind of ripping off the Bruce story or something. Now I know and am more likely to watch it. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: Sensor Sweep: Christopher Tolkien, Robert Jordan, White Wolf, Outlaw King –

  6. Pingback: November 2018 Month-in-Review | Every Day Should Be Tuesday

  7. Pingback: 2019 State of the Blog: Hillbilly Highways Edition – Hillbilly Highways

  8. Pingback: Nonfiction: Robert the Bruce: King of the Scots by Michael Penman – Hillbilly Highways

  9. Pingback: Movies: Black 47 – Hillbilly Highways

  10. Pingback: Game of Thrones: Season 6 Review | Every Day Should Be Tuesday

  11. Pingback: Celebrating One Year of Hillbilly Highways – Hillbilly Highways

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s